The FLINN Cup & ‘Zero Plastic’
By weight, the oceans could contain more plastic than fish by 2050*. Although new EU rules, to be implemented by 3 July 2021, will prohibit the 10 single-use plastic products most widely found on European shores, plastics currently make up 80-85 % of marine litter on European beaches.
Read More
DO NOT FORGET TO COMPLETE THE UBO COMPLIANCE REGISTER / SEMINAR: NEW LAW ON B2B CONTRACTS
Dear Sir, Dear Madam, The FLINN team would like to invite you to a free of charge seminar on the new Belgian law that will impact ALL B2B contractual relationships. The seminar will be held in our offices at avenue des Arts 46, 1000 Brussels, 6th floor.
Read More
The GTDT Practice Guides – Franchise has been published!
FLINN lawyers, Leonard Hawkes and Benoit Simpelaere, have contributed on part 5: Other Legal Considerations, Electronic Commerce, Social Media and Franchising to the published Practice Guides: Franchise 2019.
Read More
FLINN CUP – 7 SEPTEMBER 2019 IN OSTEND!
We would like to invite you to the second edition of the FLINN CUP which will take place this year on 7 September in Ostend.
Read More
FLINN – a proud sponsor of DIApositief!
FLINN is proud to sponsor “DIApositief” the diversity project recently launched by the Brussels’ Bar.
Read More
What does the EU Copyright reform mean for internet users?
Will researchers using text and data mining first need to obtain a copyright license? Will artists be able to negotiate better remuneration for their work? Will you be required to have a license when posting a link to a news website? This is what the European Parliament will be voting on very soon.
Read More
‘To be, or not to be’ … Brexit, Act III (with apologies to William Shakespeare)
Scene 1: The risk profile of key border-related systems
On February 28, the House of Commons Public Accounts Committee issued a statement that it had published as evidence, a National Audit Office memorandum, “The UK border: preparedness for EU exit update”.
Commenting on the memorandum the Committee Chair, Meg Hillier (Labour, Hackney South and Shoreditch) said:
“The NAO’s memorandum shows that with the clock ticking down there remain serious questions about whether the UK will be prepared at the border if there is ‘no deal’ and what this would mean for individuals and businesses.
It is alarming that six of the eight critical IT systems needed are in danger of not being ready in time and that government assesses readiness of traders as one of its most significant risks”.
The Public Accounts Committee will be pressing for answers on preparations for EU exit this week.
Scene 2: Summary of Specific Negotiating Objectives ~ United States – United Kingdom negotiations
On February 28, the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative submitted to Congress and released a summary of the Trump administration’s specific negotiating objectives for a United States-United Kingdom trade agreement.
The summary document consists of brief bullet point objectives.
Agricultural goods, the US objective is to secure: … ‘comprehensive market access for U.S. agricultural goods in the UK by reducing or eliminating tariffs’;
On the other hand, the agreement should provide for: … ‘reasonable adjustment periods for U.S. import-sensitive agricultural products, engaging in close consultation with Congress on such products before initiating tariff reduction negotiations’. (Emphasis added.)
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS):
Establish a mechanism to quickly remove unwarranted barriers that block the export of U.S. food and agricultural products in order to ‘obtain more open, equitable, and reciprocal market access’.
‘Include strong provisions on transparency and public consultation that require the UK to publish drafts of regulations, allow stakeholders in other countries to provide comments on those drafts, and require authorities to address significant issues raised by stakeholders and explain how the final measure achieves the stated objectives’. (Emphasis added.)
National Farmers’ Union (‘NFU’) President, Minette Batters, said:
“The NFU has been very clear on this point. It is imperative that any future trade deals, including a possible deal with the USA, do not allow the imports of food produced to lower standards than those required of British farmers”.
“British people value and demand the high standards of animal welfare, environmental protection and food safety that our own farmers adhere to. These world-leading standards must not be sacrificed in the pursuit of reaching rushed trade deals. We should not accept trade deals which allow food to be imported into this country produced in ways which would be illegal here”. (Emphasis added.)
Scene 3: The Attorney General’s ‘fig-leaf’
The so called “backstop” provision in the Withdrawal Agreement is intended to avoid the return of a hard border between Ireland (an EU member state) and Northern Ireland. It has become a sticking point regarding approval of the UK Government’s Withdrawal Agreement and is fiercely opposed by the so called ‘Brexiteers’ and the Democratic Unionist Party in Northern Ireland.
At the time of writing (March 4) various recent reports, in the national and international press (Times, Telegraph, Reuters), suggest that the Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox, instead of trying to introduce either a hard time-limit or unilateral exit mechanism regarding the backstop, is trying to secure an arbitration mechanism that would allow Britain or the European Union to provide formal notice that the backstop should come to an end. Reportedly, the EU is resisting demands for such a mechanism, which would fall outside the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) jurisdiction and authority to resolve EU law disputes. (See Article 19, Treaty on European Union; Articles 267 and 344 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; and the Judgment of the CJEU in Case C‑284/16, Achmea, of 6 March 2018.)
The issues summarised above, taken overall, only show a small part of the complexity of exiting the EU. They indicate that a delay beyond the current March 29th deadline looks sensible. Further, we can suggest that arguments in favour of a second referendum (that would ask if the reality of this Brexit is what was voted for), look much stronger …
(…) ‘For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
that patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When If he himself might [be permitted] his quietus [to] make’,
Or, is there really a concern that … ‘the native hue of resolution’ will be ‘sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought’, … ?
Read More
International Circulation of Artworks
On January 25th, 2019, FLINN’s partners Anna Gibello and Emmanuel VERRAES attended the Meeting of the Presidents and Representatives of the foreign Bar Councils in Milan (IT) on the “International Circulation of Artworks”. They have given a presentation on the Belgian regulations on cultural heritage and the implementation of international Treaties. Amongst the panellists were also delegates of UNESCO and UNIDROIT.
Read More
Music Moves Europe Talent Award
Yesterday evening Emmanuel Verraes attended the European Music Awards Night in Groningen, where our client ‘Blackwave’ was honoured. Blackwave won the MusicMovesEuropeTalentAward for Hip Hop / Rap, presented by EU Commissioner for Culture ‘Tibor Navracsics’ and Jools Holland, Composer and Broadcaster.
Read MoreBrexit: The Morning after the Night Before
The British Prime Minister, Mrs Theresa May, lost the Parliamentary vote on the withdrawal agreement negotiated with the European Union last night (15th January 2019) by 230 votes. It is the largest parliamentary defeat for a UK government in over a hundred years. If, as predicted, the resulting vote of no-confidence in the government is nevertheless defeated itself this evening (16th January 2019), Mrs May is due to return to Parliament next Monday (21st January 2019) with her Plan B. If there is no negotiated agreement on Britain’s divorce from the EU, ‘Brexit’ is scheduled to happen in just over ten weeks’ time on 29th March 2019.
Whether its questions are about access to the United Kingdom market or about imports from the United Kingdom arriving in the EU: what happens next really matters to business. Immediate reactions within the Parliament chamber called for a postponement of the 29th March deadline. But unless and until that happens, the default legislative position remains that (in accordance with the notice given under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union) the UK will leave the EU and become a ‘third country’ that night.
There does seem to be a cross-party majority in the UK Parliament against a disorderly exit from the EU. However, as the Prime Minister remarked immediately after hearing the result of the vote rejecting the withdrawal agreement, it remains unclear what other arrangement (if any), and on what terms, could command the support of a majority of MPs and also be accepted by the EU.
So, in summary, the clock is currently ticking down towards a disorderly Brexit. Notwithstanding the statements and documents issued by both the British government and the EU, businesses on both sides of the Channel do not generally seem prepared for a ‘no-deal’ exit. Even if, contrary to some expectations, the pound sterling (UK£) did not suffer a dramatic fall in value after the vote, uncertainty is already affecting orders and investments, particularly in the UK.
If you’re a business that trades across borders with the UK and, for example, you rely on just-in-time supply chains (and there are many manufacturing businesses beyond automobiles, for example in the food and drink industry that have such supply chains), the prospect of a ‘no-deal’ exit has serious negative implications. Some argue that last night’s vote makes such an outcome more, rather than less, likely. So, even if you are an optimist and resistant to incurring costs unnecessarily, it is very much time to assess the possible impacts of ‘no-deal’ on your business and take counter measures.
As a first step, it’s useful to know that a ‘quick-scan’ for possible issues can be made using a free tool available from the website of the FOD Economie / SPF Economie (Belgian Federal Economic Services) (the tool is available in Dutch, French and German language versions). Even if the tool acknowledges that it has limitations, using it should enable you to identify potential supply chain problems. Check whether you may be faced with additional customs verifications, tariffs or procedures (= potential delays) for imports from or exports to the UK.
In the case of a ‘no-deal’ Brexit, imports from the UK will be subject to the EU WTO import tariffs. The EU’s import tariffs, adopted in-line with its WTO obligations, are published and ‘knowable’. (They are applicable to all the countries with which the EU does not have a trade agreement.) You can look-up what they are for any products that you import.
As one example, beef imports (high quality, boneless, fresh or chilled) to the EU from any ‘third country’ are subject to a compound EU WTO import tariff (i.e. a tariff calculated partly by customs value and partly by weight) of 12.80 % (ad valorem) + 303.40 EUR / 100 kg.. Based on 2016 prices, the Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority calculated that in percentage terms that amounts to a sixty percent (60%) tariff.
Another important area for verification concerns the terms and conditions of your contracts. For example: Is there a territorial clause which assumes that the United Kingdom is a member of the European Union? What is the currency for payment? What law is the contract subject to? Is there a mechanism for contract review in light of changed circumstances? Is there a mechanism for adjusting prices and if so on what basis? How would any additional costs incurred as a result of Brexit be allocated as between the parties?
While a negotiated Brexit settlement, including a transitional period during which a free trade agreement can be negotiated, may yet be possible: every prudent business will take into account that the time within which such arrangements can be reached is, currently, very short indeed.
* Len Hawkes is a solicitor, England and Wales, and is in charge of FLINN’s Brexit Desk.
Read More